The unique challenges of fire safety in historic buildings
Preserving historic fabric: Minimising intrusion
Many modern fire safety solutions use a lot of wiring, bulky detection devices, and sprinkler systems with visible pipework. This goes against the aesthetic preservation of heritage sites with installation potentially damaging historical fabrics that have been preserved for decades. There is no way that the owner of a heritage site would agree to a system that could cause damage to original features such as carved wood or painted ceilings.
Wireless fire detection: The ideal non-intrusive solution
Wireless fire alarm systems for listed buildings circumvent these potential issues by removing the need for wires and providing much more discrete fire safety systems. By using fire systems that rely on specialist approaches such as air sampling and fire suppression via clean agents, it is possible to have a fully fire compliant heritage site that doesn’t compromise the authenticity of property in any way.
Navigating complex fire safety compliance and legislation
Listed building fire safety compliance is made more difficult due to several factors that are unique to heritage properties. In the event of a fire, the evacuation routes through a heritage site can be confusing with inadequate capacity. This is because old staircases and hallways can be narrow and winding which can lead to bottlenecks. There is also an issue with layouts often being across multiple floors which can increase evacuation times too.
Due to some heritage sites being in a difficult to reach location or of a difficult height to deal with, there can be a delay in how quickly the fire service can access all parts of a heritage property. This can lead to extensive damage in the event of a fire, due to slow response times.
Older properties do not have modern accessibility options either. Steep stairs and uneven floors can lead to evacuation being more difficult for anyone with mobility issues, which makes the provision of a Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan (PEEP) difficult.
Addressing false alarms and signal interference
With the majority of heritage sites making the majority of their income from visitors any false alarm that occurs can prove to be very costly due to unnecessary downtime. If a false alarm results in a full evacuation of a property, there may be a need to turn new visitors away and provide refunds to visitors whose visit was interrupted. This can result in a significant loss in revenue and lead to staff members developing ‘alert fatigue’.
The issue of false alarms can be more common in older properties too. This is because they often accumulate dust and other air particles that can interfere with traditional smoke detection systems. More false alarms means more lost revenue and an increase in ‘alert fatigue’ among staff which can lead to a genuine fire being taken less seriously, resulting in slower evacuations and an increased chance of fatal incidents.
Fire Alarms
Panic Alarms
Intruder Alarms
Sprinkler Systems
Plant Alarms
Gas Alarms